So then you should have asked "is it rude to bluff into a dry side pot?" instead of showing the hand. When you showed the hand you imply that you want the hand scrutinized.


Also you obviously didn't read Gders post because you would have realized why you did NOT have the odds to call with the 2s.

Personally I dont think that the guy with AK did anyting wrong, in fact, I would have pushed all-in after the other guy went in to isolate myself with the pusher.

__________________
Lots of good rakeback options at http://www.raketherake.com/?refer=RTR25126

KRE8R probably has about seventy college funds in his NL5 roll.

the guy bluffs the empty side pot.. simple - that's bad etiquette i heard but he didnt seem to think so

It's not exactly a bluff in this circumstance as I posted in my very first response.

And therefore it's not bad etiquette.

Bluffing to bluff with no hope of winning= bad

Bluffing to isolate the All-in and take on the main pot by yourself = fine

__________________

o rly?

but i had the better hand, it felt like a bluff to me but i didnt have the balls to call such a big raise.

Which is why it was a good move from him.

Who's his brother?????

Which is proof you shouldn't have been in the pot in the firstplace.

When he was last banned his brother posted on his behalf.

If his brother exists then I'm the pope.