|
PokerForums.org
> General
> General Poker Discussion
>
Multi-tablers..ever been on a rush on all tables?
| Notices |
We have detected that you don't have an account with us yet (or haven't logged in). We encourage you to register an account: it's free, and then you'll be able to post on the forum! |

03-14-2006, 11:26 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
|
|
Multi-tablers..ever been on a rush on all tables?
Just curious, for those who play at least 3 tables or more, have you ever had a session where you were just killing all the tables? I don't think I've ever had a session where I was up big on all my tables, I've had times where I'll double my buy-in on one, loose half on another and be basically even on the rest.... things like that where overall it's either up a bit or down for the whole session, and I'm sure it all boils down to just the variance between the hands. But who here have had sessions where they were just scoring on all tables, and if so how often has it happened?
__________________
If you're looking to borrow money or have someone give you money in order to play poker online please don't contact me... Click Here for help , and explain your situation.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|

03-14-2006, 12:49 PM
|
 |
Poker Hustler
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: l.a. county
Posts: 901
|
|
my tables usually run about the same, for some reason. if i'm up much on one, i'm probably up on the others as well, although maybe not by quite so much. i can definitely remember being way up on all my tables though. but when i do poorly on one table, the others tend to only break even or be up a little. maybe my game's kinda variable, or maybe when i'm down on one i focus too much on bringing that one up and not enough on the others. i don't like being below my initial buy-in...bugs me.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marm
Nope, I'm going with the 7:5 missy, shes a possum with fangs.
|
|

03-14-2006, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Poker Hustler
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,195
|
|
With 2 tables, I can (over a long enough time) get them both up about equal amounts. With 3 or more, I'm usually up on one, even on another and down on one, but I usually end up for the session...
I usually attribute the variance on tables to the tables themselves. I've often played with the idea of playing several tables and when I start getting way ahead on one table, closing out the others and just playing that one table (or 2 if I'm up on 2) because there are usually more loose/weak players on that (those) tables...
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jason75
I like trons' advice.
|
Trons
JstTrons
Toyotatruck
|

03-14-2006, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Poker Hustler
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: l.a. county
Posts: 901
|
|
yeah, i've thought about that too, but currently i'm not playing at big enough sites. if i stick to the tables that are going the best, i continue to do well, but i lose the additional profit from multi-tabling cuz there aren't enough tables open to go to new ones after i eliminate the ones that weren't doing as well. that might work, however, on a big site, or if you diversified games or limits. i may try that.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marm
Nope, I'm going with the 7:5 missy, shes a possum with fangs.
|
|

03-14-2006, 03:07 PM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,615
|
|
just now - playing 4 tables of .25/.50 NL
played about 30mins - 1 hr.
bought in for 50 dollars on each table.
when i stopped, i had $83, $97, $63, $41
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM.
|
 |
|