Should probably put this in the newb section but...

What do you No Limit or Pot Limit guys have for win rates, BB/100.

Or

What have you heard is a good, great, phenomonal win rate

__________________
For poker news, strategy, and more, check out my daily column at Examiner.com

i only have 3k hands in the DB. dont know how to import stars.

12.97bb/100 hands.
16.30bb/100 @ the level that i do 95% of my playing. (.10/.25nl)

this # would prolly go down if the sample was 50k+ hands b/c I think it seem right.

for short handed prolly an excellent # would be 30bb/100.

excellent full ring prolly 10bb/100

i dont know siht about bb/100.

__________________
I get more ass than a toilet seat. All shapes/colors/sizes.

caution:
http://girlvideos.blogspot.com/

Over about 7k hands at 1c/2cNL I'm at 35.70bb/100

That's at 1c/2cNL though so no idea at what it would be at higher limits.

That sounds about right for the micros....

__________________

2.5bb/100 @ 1/2 Limit.
25% ROI on SnG's (mostly $10+1 full or $12+1 shorthanded)..

There's a guy on Prima called Johan_haren. He was the most consistent player at my level when I was on there and over 7k hands his win rate at .50/$1 and $1/$2 was around 12bb/100.

I dont have enough hands to answer with my win rate (especially after tilting off a ton on the train ride home on friday)..........

But I have read that for small stakes NL the best players typically are around 10 BB/100

Big question..

For a start @ 0.5/1 1/2 over 1000 hands I've made upwards of 30bb/100. BUT these were excursions.

At these limits if ppl are deep stacking you won't find much of a sensible answer for less than 50k hands. e.g A three way deep stack all-in will win 100bb (2xbig blind) - add a couple of AA/KK playoffs in your favour then your bb/100 is secured for the next 20k hands.

I'm not even sure I can answer. I often bonus whore which means mutlitabling and I know that I play at 3.5-4bb/100 (just playing cards). With no table selection

If I restrict my self to two tables and spend time table selecting then I will push this up to 15bb/100 BUT I waste time table-selecting and often the tables aren't there. Furthermore - I am not playing great poker - I am simply playing crap poker players.. eg. play at WPT online there are flop entries there of 50% at £1/£2 and you can't use pokertracker - Heaven

As soon as tables start selecting cards and position I think 3-4 bb/100 is as much as you can hope for with a good rake and the odd fish.

Gder claims 16bb/100 for 3k - I think at those limits that's unlikely to be sustained - certainly if you're deep stacking - the rake will kill you.

Johan is a loose aggressive player (well thats his rep -but infact he's just hitting blinds and finds it hard to let go ) and he has massive variance - over the time he's been playing on TV you won't have enough on him...

__________________
See me playing $10/$20NL like it was play money

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...405&q=xxdemexx

Doberman: "but Sarge, isn't poker gambling and just luck?"
Sgt. Bilko:" not the way I play it"

My limited Ring experience shows me at 5bb/100 at .1/.25 for just 3k hands. Just wanted to learn how to play a semi-decent game, too early to say whether I did or not.

ROI% for SnGs is 25%+ at various levels and currently 28% for $55s over 130 buy-ins. I reckon I need 300 before this finds it's true level.

thanks for the responses guys. I just started using PT Omaha.

Over 20,000 hands of $25 PLO I'm at 17.5BB/100, over 11,000 hands at $50 I'm at 10.6BB/100

from what I'm reading, anything over 10BB/100 is pretty good (barring micro limits)?

Deme brings up a good point, does your win rate change drastically going from 1 to 2 to 4 tables?

__________________
For poker news, strategy, and more, check out my daily column at Examiner.com