For the past few weeks, I’ve been playing NL10 online, down from what I use to play at NL100 or NL200 (Only play NL200 live). I used to be sarcastic about the style of play at this these levels, but TBH I don’t find it all that bad. However, I prefer SH simply for the fact that there are usually only 2 maniacs at the table and the other 3 are often half decent players. At FR tables, I find there is often 4 maniacs or LAGs, which I find tough to handle, yet still profitable

What do other NL10 players prefer FR or SH and why? Is this level considered micro stakes?

__________________
If you feel you have a question, dont be lazy; make sure you have asked yourself first. Then search the forum, then just fucking google it to get as much detail as you can. You may then seek clarification on specific points from others.

any level up to probably nl100 would be microstakes in my mind and possibly even higher levels.

ive played a little bit of nl10 6max recently and tbh i didnt think it was as easy as i thought it would be....this is either because it genuinely wasnt all that bad or because im still a nl novice.

i prefer playing 6max for all games simply because i have always found there are more donks playing than at FR and as poor as i may still be at nl, i still feel im better than them.

__________________
For the best rakeback rates, greatest choice of poker rooms, more promotions, tournaments and bigger $$$ freerolls than any other rakeback affiliate, visit RakeTheRake, one of the largest and most reputable poker rakeback affiliates in the world.

Get constant bonuses and superb customer support at RedKings. (Non-US only){its rigged for me but prob not u}

µstakes = NL2 - NL50

Why not play both? I play 75% 6max and 25% FR. I think that more donks play 6max and it is more profitable to a winning player. But you can play more tables if you play FR. My ptbb/100 is higher for 6max but my overall winrate per hour is higher for FR, because I usually 9 table FR.

__________________
:(