Hmm tricky. We'll define a PFOer by one that has at least 20 posts.

__________________
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann

But I really wanted to pick 60-70%....(okay not really, but you forgot it nonetheless)

__________________
Bean181818: some guy came up just grabbed my hand and starting massaging it, since it wasn't you, i told him to fuck off
xcrunman02: yeah only I can do that, i don't need some gook trying to get with my life partner
Bean181818: i've been faithful
xcrunman02: me too
Bean181818: peck tried to get all this but i told him this was all taken, all of it!

Bah my bad

__________________
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann

i haven't got a clue??

i would guess that someone who bothers to think about thier game, read/post at forums would have an advantage over others who do not.

this is if they properly pick their games/limits

fixed

Fix 80-100 to 90-100

__________________
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann

Such a weird way to label the thread. I was sorta confused by what you meant, Bonch. I voted with the numbers, assuming that you mean consistantly making money?

I picked 60-70%. But then again who knows, I only go by what I see, and my own numbers...

__________________

quite a spread there.

one vote for 90-100%? that's a ton of faith in these people.

at least no one said 0-5%. that'd be kinda sad. a whole forum of losers.

40-50% may be a little high, but I figure there are enough people on here that are barely making profit. That would classify them as "winning."

I think I picked 7-80, people who have studied their game and practice, and within their limits (already said sorry).

I think 95% of players whp post/read on any good forum regularly for 1 year+ should be winnign players.

__________________