Originally Posted by PokerEdge

xxdemexx: "Looking through the site I also see some errors in analysis. "aggression > 2 = bluffer" - I get postf aggression (NL) of 3 (peaking at 4.5 on turn).. I do bluff sometimes but it would wrong to catagorise me as systematic bluffer and it would cause me a great deal of fun if you did so."

I believe the page you are referring to is this one:
http://www.poker-edge.com/stats.php

This is where I state: "I like to consider players above 2.0 to be clear-cut aggressive and players below 1.0 to be clear-cut passive. Remember - aggressive players are much more likely to be bluffing or semi-bluffing when betting and raising."

I never meant to say that aggression>2 means a big bluffer. I was simply stating that more aggressive means more likely to be bluffing or semi bluffing. For example, if a player with aggression<1 raises or bets, you can almost be certain he has a strong hand. But a player with an aggression>3 has the *capability* to be bluffing or semi bluffing. Also, I was referring to limit stats with those numbers. The Aggression numbers for NL shuould be slightly higher.