Hi Hol,
looks like a PT derived product.They might have got PT and simply observed 30 tables at a go (possible) for a few weeks. I even heard that ppl were buying PT databases at one point.
They have a lot of players logged BUT, so have I, and very few of them last a week so the dataset probably isn't that useful.
Before you get someones game down I reckon you need 200 hands and ppl don't last this long!! Another problem is that they rarely show the winning hand so you can't get too much of a handle.
At the lower limits then you're best to think 'fish' all the time. At the higher limits you really know whose bets to respect-if you don't know... then move down. Maniacs are self evident.
Looking through the site I also see some errors in analysis. "aggression > 2 = bluffer" - I get postf aggression (NL) of 3 (peaking at 4.5 on turn).. I do bluff sometimes but it would wrong to catagorise me as systematic bluffer and it would cause me a great deal of fun if you did so.
I'd be interested to hear if anyones used it... AND what figures it has for me
..one of my aliases id xxdemexx - the other aliases are secret
PT still seems to be the best option I think.