View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 10:16 PM
KRE8R's Avatar
KRE8R KRE8R is offline
NL20 Grinder...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,526
Trade Rating: (3)
Limits Played: $0.10-$0.25 NL
Send a message via AIM to KRE8R
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-O View Post
I'm using loose-tight, and passive-aggressive as my main classification

loose/aggressive = 1
tight/aggressive = 2
loose/passive = 3
loose/aggressive = 4

the decision making and deception are sub categories, giving us a total of 16 classifications

emotional/deceptive = 1
logical/deceptive = 2
emotional/straightforward = 3
logical/straightforward = 4

So, a loose/aggressive, emotional/straightforward player is 1.3

A tight/aggressive, logical/deceptive is a 2.2 (obviously a dangerous player)

Therefore:

Any player who starts with a 2 is good

Any player with a .2 is what I would deem dangerous to a basic strategy

A 2.2 player is a pretty certain bet to be good and dangerous

And obviously youcould come up with ways to adjust to different types
This is actually pretty sweet Steve-O. Only problem is the secondary ones seem like they could be kinda marginal to go on. Like so often people could be an even mix of two different types of stats.
__________________
Lots of good rakeback options at http://www.raketherake.com/?refer=RTR25126

KRE8R probably has about seventy college funds in his NL5 roll.
Reply With Quote